Burgershot
  • Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
Burgershot open.mp Development Updates Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility

Poll: Do you want to see DL features in open.mp?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
YES - I am a SERVER OWNER/DEV and would use these a lot on my server
63.27%
124 63.27%
YES - I am a player and would play on servers that had these features
27.04%
53 27.04%
DON'T CARE - I might use them or might not, don't care either way
6.63%
13 6.63%
NO - I do not want to see these features.
3.06%
6 3.06%
Total 196 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

 
  • 4 Vote(s) - 5 Average
Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility
EvilShadeZ
Offline

Burgershot Member
Posts: 21
Threads: 5
Joined: Apr 2019
Reputation: 2
#31
2020-04-25, 11:18 AM
I think the solution could be having a server browser filter servers by download size. If people don't want any downloads then they can easily select max download size at 0MB. I'm not a fan of having a total download limit, as it might prevent servers from utilising fully custom created maps, unless the cap is high enough not to matter. As for vetting servers, I don't think anyone wants to do that, but what could be done is "Open.mp endorsed servers" which have their own tab in the server browser and have been known to be high(er) quality and not using any ripped assets or such.

I do not believe public object pool would be such a great idea, especially for a server that's being developed, especially if it is a part from an entirely custom terrain. Whoever would be vetting these would be spammed with obscene amounts of requests, especially if server's in development. And how you actually develop the custom terrain without having the object vetted first? (Sounds like a bottleneck to me)
[Image: qPwh60X.png]
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by Media - 2020-04-15, 02:15 AM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by dreftas - 2020-04-15, 11:03 AM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by Logan - 2020-04-15, 12:35 PM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by Ezio_Auditore - 2020-04-15, 12:40 PM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by Manyula - 2020-04-15, 01:55 PM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by AliceTS - 2020-04-15, 03:21 PM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by Konstantine - 2020-04-15, 04:03 PM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by Twixxer - 2020-04-16, 02:02 AM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by Y_Less - 2020-04-18, 11:18 AM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by Twixxer - 2020-04-22, 02:42 PM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by Sasino97 - 2020-04-16, 02:52 AM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by DaZzY - 2020-12-03, 08:53 AM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by DTV - 2020-04-18, 12:09 AM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by [DoD]Ron - 2020-04-18, 06:24 AM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by Starboi - 2020-04-18, 12:23 PM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by Redirect Left - 2020-04-18, 06:55 PM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by Markski - 2020-04-19, 04:03 AM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by Jastak - 2020-04-19, 08:03 PM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by zenderlyproj - 2020-04-20, 10:00 AM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by scott_41 - 2020-04-20, 02:15 PM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by zenderlyproj - 2020-04-20, 02:32 PM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by scott_41 - 2020-04-20, 02:42 PM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by deepCode - 2020-04-21, 08:08 PM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by Freeze - 2020-04-22, 10:41 AM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by Manyula - 2020-04-22, 03:33 PM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by Twixxer - 2020-04-22, 04:05 PM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by BloodMaster - 2020-04-27, 11:20 PM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by Gaudeamus271 - 2020-04-28, 10:07 PM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by Expert* - 2020-04-22, 02:52 PM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by Manyula - 2020-04-22, 04:42 PM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by Agus - 2020-04-23, 01:30 AM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by Gforcez - 2020-04-23, 01:18 PM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by WestCoast - 2020-04-25, 06:20 AM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by EvilShadeZ - 2020-04-25, 11:18 AM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by Twixxer - 2020-04-25, 11:36 AM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by Hype - 2020-04-27, 03:59 PM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by Janichar - 2020-04-27, 05:45 PM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by gta191977649 - 2020-05-08, 05:28 AM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by Paradise - 2020-05-10, 03:07 PM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by Pinch - 2020-05-12, 07:59 AM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by ATomas - 2020-05-14, 10:00 AM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by Deity - 2020-05-17, 06:13 PM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by Dash - 2020-07-01, 08:59 PM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by Abyss - 2020-11-18, 04:05 AM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by #Dark - 2020-12-03, 07:57 AM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by #Dark - 2020-12-03, 09:20 AM
RE: Your thoughts on SAMP 0.3.DL compatibility - by Virsenas - 2021-02-25, 12:40 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread
Forum Jump:

© Burgershot - Powered by our Community and MyBB Original Theme by Emerald

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode